RE: Indiana State Law Still Allows Businesses to Refuse Service Based on Sexuality
April 2, 2015 at 3:06 pm
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2015 at 3:07 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(April 2, 2015 at 3:04 pm)robvalue Wrote: I see! Except I'm even more confused. So in practical terms, it did nothing? Except highlight a bigotry loophole that already existed?
Am I missing something?! Seems like they shot themselves in both feet and the ass!
The motivation does seem a bit....strange-as-fuck. My guess would be they wanted to provide a religious cover to their actions, so if/when they refuse service to gays (or any other non-protected status like hair color, tattoos, etc), they had something to fall back on legally AND religiously.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson


