(April 6, 2015 at 2:51 pm)Heywood Wrote: I argued that all human beings have the right to life. Not just the subset of human beings those in power declare have the right to life. The Nazis did the same thing the proabortion movement advocates. The proabortion movement advocates that only certain humans beings have the right to life just like the Nazis did.
Godwin is alive and well, I see.
No, you argued that life begins at conception. You were asked to provide proof of this considering that there's no brain and therefore no being at conception. You were forced to admit it's "just how you see it".
Needless to say, a personal feeling that can't be logically argued isn't a good basis to intrude on someone else's life and make decisions for them but you repeatedly said you were perfectly fine with that.
I guess businesses and corporations have personal freedom to make choices, even when they hurt other people, but women have no such rights, even when they're only harming a collection of mindless cells.
But don't let me stop you from screaming "Nazi, Nazi, Nazi". It suits the eloquence of all of your other "arguments" to support your positions .
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
