(April 12, 2015 at 5:26 pm)Polaris Wrote: Tyson doesn't come off as genuine and the whole story just appeared to be him trying to justify him being the host.So, nothing is your answer. You just don't like him. Got it.
(April 12, 2015 at 5:26 pm)Polaris Wrote: I would rather have someone who speaks at a higher level about the cosmos as Kaku does much more often, than another Bill Nye. Sure people like Bill Nye were great when we were kids, but I expect much more out of a show like Cosmos than what has Tyson provided. Plus, I would like Tyson to spend more time worrying about science than wasting valuable time addressing the people who made him feel butt-hurt about the age of the universe.The whole point of Cosmos wasn't to capture your wonder. It was for the adolescent who might become the next Michio Kaku or Carl Sagan. Hence the cartoons and the lack of in depth science. It was a primetime show, FFS. They aren't going to do an hour on susy or quantum mechanics.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
