RE: Do you believe in free will?
September 7, 2010 at 1:40 am
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2010 at 1:42 am by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
@Flobee
You asked ,I answered, setting out my position. I'm terribly sorry ,but it's a matter of indifference to me if you agree or understand or not. My view is neither original nor unique. If you want to know more,Google is your friend.
You have some way to go before establishing any credibility with me.Until/unless that occurs,you're just another presuppositional apologist who has stumbled onto an atheist forum.
Such people argue from the presupposition of the existence of God,and are not willing to consider the possibility of error although they have no evidence for their position.IE in recorded history,the existence of god(s) has not been proved or falsified. That position makes them closed minded,and a waste of time. I have no interest in deconverting anyone;I really don't care about your personal superstitions.
One cannot use reason to discuss beliefs/views in which reason plays no part in forming or in maintaining.
I hope I'm wrong. I've been wrong about such a person here before ,once.
You asked ,I answered, setting out my position. I'm terribly sorry ,but it's a matter of indifference to me if you agree or understand or not. My view is neither original nor unique. If you want to know more,Google is your friend.
You have some way to go before establishing any credibility with me.Until/unless that occurs,you're just another presuppositional apologist who has stumbled onto an atheist forum.
Such people argue from the presupposition of the existence of God,and are not willing to consider the possibility of error although they have no evidence for their position.IE in recorded history,the existence of god(s) has not been proved or falsified. That position makes them closed minded,and a waste of time. I have no interest in deconverting anyone;I really don't care about your personal superstitions.
One cannot use reason to discuss beliefs/views in which reason plays no part in forming or in maintaining.
I hope I'm wrong. I've been wrong about such a person here before ,once.
Quote: If you could reason with religious people, there wouldn't be any (Greg House)