RE: Being gay is a fetish.
April 20, 2015 at 3:35 pm
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2015 at 3:38 pm by John V.)
Here's another article:
http://socpro.oxfordjournals.org/content...6.abstract
Excerpt:
The paper argues that the tension which characterizes relations between lesbian- and bisexual-identified women is not the result of failure to recognize these similarities in experience. Instead, historical circumstances have led to a situation in which bisexuality poses a personal and political threat to lesbians and lesbian politics; the similarity between lesbians'and bisexuals' experiences aggravates rather than mitigates this threat.
Huh, that's what I was saying.
If the baker had a clear opposite-sex prerequisitie, would you accept it? If not, why do you make excuses for the gay bar?
http://socpro.oxfordjournals.org/content...6.abstract
Excerpt:
The paper argues that the tension which characterizes relations between lesbian- and bisexual-identified women is not the result of failure to recognize these similarities in experience. Instead, historical circumstances have led to a situation in which bisexuality poses a personal and political threat to lesbians and lesbian politics; the similarity between lesbians'and bisexuals' experiences aggravates rather than mitigates this threat.
Huh, that's what I was saying.
(April 20, 2015 at 3:29 pm)robvalue Wrote: Right, so if the sexuality was a pre requisite which is made clear, that's not a random discrimination as such. Although I would worry about people making "not gay bars", if it was something that could be enforced.
But would you condemn a baker who refuses to serve someone because they are gay? Morally speaking.
If the baker had a clear opposite-sex prerequisitie, would you accept it? If not, why do you make excuses for the gay bar?
