RE: About Islam
April 21, 2015 at 5:21 pm
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2015 at 5:33 pm by Mystic.)
What I'm showing by this is the following:
1. These verses have an interpretation proven by either logic, flow of verses, or other parts of the Quran.
2. The true interpretation is the more clearer of the interpretations.
3. The false interpretation is assumed for some reason by majority of Muslims.
4. This cannot be rationally explained by natural reasons, there is a reason as to why they can't recite the verses with true interpretation when it's supported by logic or flow of verses or other parts of the Quran, and is also the clearer of the interpretations.
5. The best explanation is that there a supernatural influence on the people to prevent them from seeing the family of Mohammad, the Imams of guidance, and their position in Quran.
6. The dark forces being enemy to the family of Mohammad and the true recitation of Quran, is best explained if the family of Mohammad are true Guides and the dark force doesn't want the Muslims to recognize this.
I think it's an argument that is rational. For example "Then we inherited the book to those who we chosen from our servants" - the way the word astafa is used through out Quran refers to exalting way above and specially choosing for a higher position (I showed all twelve verses they are used in and you can see that) and refers to specifically the best of humanity and as Talut verses show, they are those who are the true kings given authority of God. But Sunnis through out Quran in all other 11 verses see it to mean that, except, when it states there is chosen ones that inherited the book after it was revealed to Mohammad (saw).
I see this as irrational but the irrationality cannot be justified by simply natural means, but this blindness must be have a supernatural cause. If there was no dark attacks on the heart, I think by naturally, people would see the verses more rationally and not always assume the illogical non-rational meaning that go against other verses of Quran, logic, and flow of the verses.
To me, it's a manifest that there is hidden dark forces that are enemies to the family of Mohammad. Aside from that, the fact the Quran showed people needed to be conveyed a message by the Prophet about Ali and his position and that is family is of the 2nd weighty thing left by the Prophet along with Quran in more clear terms showing that despite how clear they are in Quran to sincere reflection, there is a covering and blindness to them by the masses! That says a whole lot about the author of Quran, as if it knew people's hearts and their veils and that they would not see the more clearer of the interpretations and that one that is confirmed by logic and other verses of Quran.
1. These verses have an interpretation proven by either logic, flow of verses, or other parts of the Quran.
2. The true interpretation is the more clearer of the interpretations.
3. The false interpretation is assumed for some reason by majority of Muslims.
4. This cannot be rationally explained by natural reasons, there is a reason as to why they can't recite the verses with true interpretation when it's supported by logic or flow of verses or other parts of the Quran, and is also the clearer of the interpretations.
5. The best explanation is that there a supernatural influence on the people to prevent them from seeing the family of Mohammad, the Imams of guidance, and their position in Quran.
6. The dark forces being enemy to the family of Mohammad and the true recitation of Quran, is best explained if the family of Mohammad are true Guides and the dark force doesn't want the Muslims to recognize this.
I think it's an argument that is rational. For example "Then we inherited the book to those who we chosen from our servants" - the way the word astafa is used through out Quran refers to exalting way above and specially choosing for a higher position (I showed all twelve verses they are used in and you can see that) and refers to specifically the best of humanity and as Talut verses show, they are those who are the true kings given authority of God. But Sunnis through out Quran in all other 11 verses see it to mean that, except, when it states there is chosen ones that inherited the book after it was revealed to Mohammad (saw).
I see this as irrational but the irrationality cannot be justified by simply natural means, but this blindness must be have a supernatural cause. If there was no dark attacks on the heart, I think by naturally, people would see the verses more rationally and not always assume the illogical non-rational meaning that go against other verses of Quran, logic, and flow of the verses.
To me, it's a manifest that there is hidden dark forces that are enemies to the family of Mohammad. Aside from that, the fact the Quran showed people needed to be conveyed a message by the Prophet about Ali and his position and that is family is of the 2nd weighty thing left by the Prophet along with Quran in more clear terms showing that despite how clear they are in Quran to sincere reflection, there is a covering and blindness to them by the masses! That says a whole lot about the author of Quran, as if it knew people's hearts and their veils and that they would not see the more clearer of the interpretations and that one that is confirmed by logic and other verses of Quran.
