(April 24, 2015 at 6:00 pm)gomlbrobro Wrote: What I was trying to say is that the main voices control the community. The voices happen to have the same opinion, as well. My point is that there are other theories, which you might be aware of, that aren't publicized because they contradict the existing ones.
Yes, that would be because the main voices usually have the credentials. They have peer reviews and in some cases nobel prizes going for them as opposed to any apologetic in the whole wide world.
Science isn't a debating club. It's based on empiric evidence and if someone isn't published it's because their work is crap. Not because of some conspiracy.