(April 24, 2015 at 6:00 pm)gomlbrobro Wrote: Note that when I say, "...the scientific community is corrupt", I am not saying popularized science necessarily false, at all. What I was trying to say is that the main voices control the community. The voices happen to have the same opinion, as well. My point is that there are other theories, which you might be aware of, that aren't publicized because they contradict the existing ones. My target audience for the writing was for uneducated people; people who would not know that there are other theories. I'm assuming you guys have looked at various theories on both sides, and rightly so. I'm not offended at all; I am fully aware that you guys know more. It is my personal decision, regardless of my ignorant knowledge, to believe in a deity. I sure hope you guys don't disagree with that.
You see this snippet shows that you don't understand the scientific community at all. It is the new theory that wins the Nobel.
What you are thinking of uniformity of thought and suppressing opposing views are religions.
Contradicting views that aren't supported are the ones without evidence, the kooky crackpot theories that don't stand up to scrutiny theories like intelligent design which are just ways to shoe horn their practitioners beliefs into science and do it badly.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
