RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
April 27, 2015 at 6:33 pm
(This post was last modified: April 27, 2015 at 6:36 pm by Alex K.)
@over The Hill
I agree with almost everything you say. I don't quite get the urgency to solve the specificity problem, and I have no problem with true randomness selecting a subset of possibilities, but I share the view that from a QM interpretation perspective, the multiverse is conceptually the most parsimonious scenario even if it subjectively seems wasteful, because it can be realized purely by having unitary time evolution without artificial wave function collapse.
I don't get your idea that the physical constants should add up to zero. That doesn't even make sense unit-wise.
I agree with almost everything you say. I don't quite get the urgency to solve the specificity problem, and I have no problem with true randomness selecting a subset of possibilities, but I share the view that from a QM interpretation perspective, the multiverse is conceptually the most parsimonious scenario even if it subjectively seems wasteful, because it can be realized purely by having unitary time evolution without artificial wave function collapse.
I don't get your idea that the physical constants should add up to zero. That doesn't even make sense unit-wise.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
