1. Internet, computers, etc = evidence of science working. Our knowledge and utilization of science on this earth has been successful. Why do you assume that knowledge of the most complex phenomenon will ever be discovered. Human kind, by your belief, will surely die off before that point. Science is no where close to making sense of the origin of the cosmos.
2. "Why put faith in the biased assertions of scientists over the biased assertions of theism. (I say theism because the teachings/representation of a religion is not always what that religion was originally founded upon)."
Sorry for the bad writing... I didn't mean to convey that scientists were "biased" in my statement (although I have before).
I mean "biased" as in they already have their mind set of what they believe. Their intentions are biased by trying to prove science creation, meaning they don't entertain the concept of a god in the first place. When I say, "the biased assertions of theism", I mean the founding fathers of the religion (eg. Jesus and followers, Muhammad, Hindu founders). It was a comparison of the different bias, illustrating that there is also the same ignorance in the scientific community. (Note: not ignorance of their pursuit to tangible knowledge, but ignorance in bias.)
2. "Why put faith in the biased assertions of scientists over the biased assertions of theism. (I say theism because the teachings/representation of a religion is not always what that religion was originally founded upon)."
Sorry for the bad writing... I didn't mean to convey that scientists were "biased" in my statement (although I have before).
I mean "biased" as in they already have their mind set of what they believe. Their intentions are biased by trying to prove science creation, meaning they don't entertain the concept of a god in the first place. When I say, "the biased assertions of theism", I mean the founding fathers of the religion (eg. Jesus and followers, Muhammad, Hindu founders). It was a comparison of the different bias, illustrating that there is also the same ignorance in the scientific community. (Note: not ignorance of their pursuit to tangible knowledge, but ignorance in bias.)
