RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
April 30, 2015 at 4:52 pm
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2015 at 4:58 pm by Darkstar.)
(April 30, 2015 at 4:33 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:(April 30, 2015 at 3:03 am)Godschild Wrote: God is so complex and pefect nothing could have designed Him.
GC
And yet, the typical christer claim about the eye is that it's too complex to not have a designer. You can't have it both ways GC. If the eye is too complex, then something even more complex has an even greater need for a designer.
The more complex something is, the more obviously it needs a designer. Except when it doesn't. It's all just a bunch of special pleading, really.
Why is the notion that the most complex thing imaginable just exists for no reason is more believable than the least complex thing imaginable (e.g. fundamental particles) existing for no reason. You would think that, using their own logic, it would be the other way around.
Wait, maybe I'm onto something here...
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
