The Human Eye: A Double Standard?

[Ravenshire]

And yet, the typical christer claim about the eye is that it's too complex to not have a designer. You can't have it both ways GC. If the eye is too complex, then something even more complex has an even greater need for a designer.

You're not understanding what I said, try this, God is completely complex, beyond all else. So the eye is a simple thing for God to design, the eye is to complex for evolution to have designed. Unless you are a proponent of macro evolution, if you are you still have a real problem with the eye in that a non thinking anything could design a complete anything. 

GC

(emphasisis mine)

Nah. Unlike you, I'm more a proponent of understanding how evolution actually works.

And yes, I do understand your bullshit claim. Complexity requires a designer. The part you refuse to see (more willful ignorance) is that ultimate complexity would require the ultimate designer. You still don't get to have it both ways. So, what designed your gawd GC?