(May 6, 2015 at 7:25 am)Riketto Wrote: Once again you are back to admitting that you can't actually distinguish between physical evidence and non physical evidence like spiritual evidence.You are explaining how we can use non-physical evidence to detect something by comparing it to... physical evidence. I've read your words, and they say the same thing over and over. Non-physical evidence is the sort of evidence that you "just know." Which makes you no different than the child who plays with an invisible friend, or the man who holds lengthy philosophical discussions with his neighbor's dog. In other words, there's no reason to think that your non-physical evidence exists anywhere outside of your imagination.
If you would have paid attention to my words...........As you can perceive that the flow get you closer and closer to the ocean you automatically know that you are doing well.........you
could have understood that to me this evidence.
Suppose that you are lost in the forest.
You feel like drinking and you feel that by finding a river you will find your way out the mess in which you are.
Slowly, slowly you hear the noise that the water make when is flowing.
The more you head in direction of that noise and the more you are sure that your path is the right one.
Do you follow me now?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould