(May 21, 2015 at 10:41 am)Stimbo Wrote: Again, dikdik, the point evades you. It's not a question of whether the experiment interests you - you've made claims about the superiority of your "intuitional science" over the regular kind. I have asked you on repeated occasions to put it to the test, to demonstrate it in action, and you've stalled each time with a choking smokescreen of red herring and ad hominem. There's only one conclusion to be drawn at this point: the emperor, for all his protestations of being a fashion icon, is naked.
You still don't get it, do you StimStim!
I am interested in that kind of intuition that make me realize that i am God not that intuition that allow you to see inside a box.
Unfortunately your weak intuition make you believe that all intuitions must lead to guess things related to physical object.
Intuitional science is all about discovering your inner self.
Who you really are.
I certainly said that intuitional science is superior to anything else.
We live in a physical world made of matter so it obvious that the consciousness is superior to matter and because of this
by working on the consciousness you create more progress than if you would work on the matter.
Can the vehicle be superior to the driver?
Can this world made of matter be superior to the human consciousness?
Of course not, that is why by developing the consciousness you are much better off than if you would concentrating on the matter
and your magic boxes.
I never said that intuitional science is all about to tell you what is inside boxes.
On the contrary is all about discovering your real inner self but your poor intuition twist all around.
By the way i still wait to hear from you about the meaning of philosophy and who qualify to be a philosopher.
Do you think i will get an answer by the next Christmas?
I mean 2015 Christmas not 2051 Christmas.
