The fine tuning argument

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: August 8, 2026, 1:06 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

The fine tuning argument

Captain Scarlet Offline

Member

Religious Views: Atheist

Posts: 765
Threads: 40
Joined: August 8, 2010
Reputation: 21

#30

RE: The fine tuning argument

September 22, 2010 at 4:27 pm (This post was last modified: September 22, 2010 at 4:28 pm by Captain Scarlet.)

[quote='solja247' pid='95358' dateline='1285118784']

Quote:Fine tuned not only for life but also elements, galaxies and stars. What would happen, if the universe consisted of the Sun, Earth and the moon? We shouldnt take a reductionists approach to the cosmos...

Well first you have to prove design and you haven't. Then you need to show why it is mankind that is the object of the design and not black holes. What non theological evidence can you offer?

"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 11, 2010 at 10:58 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Tiberius - September 11, 2010 at 11:16 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by padraic - September 12, 2010 at 12:41 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Minimalist - September 12, 2010 at 2:23 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Skipper - September 12, 2010 at 6:28 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Zen Badger - September 12, 2010 at 2:38 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Shinylight - September 12, 2010 at 5:41 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 12, 2010 at 6:56 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by The Omnissiunt One - September 12, 2010 at 7:07 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 12, 2010 at 7:28 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by LastPoet - September 12, 2010 at 7:30 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by downbeatplumb - September 12, 2010 at 7:33 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 12, 2010 at 9:01 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Tiberius - September 12, 2010 at 9:38 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 12, 2010 at 12:00 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by lrh9 - September 12, 2010 at 9:08 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 12, 2010 at 9:09 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by lrh9 - September 12, 2010 at 9:26 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Entropist - September 12, 2010 at 9:17 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by LastPoet - September 12, 2010 at 12:14 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by socratation - September 21, 2010 at 4:49 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by tackattack - September 21, 2010 at 1:32 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by downbeatplumb - September 21, 2010 at 2:05 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Skipper - September 21, 2010 at 5:23 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 21, 2010 at 6:04 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by theVOID - September 21, 2010 at 8:02 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by theVOID - September 21, 2010 at 4:53 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 21, 2010 at 9:26 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 22, 2010 at 4:27 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by TheDarkestOfAngels - September 21, 2010 at 9:46 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by socratation - September 23, 2010 at 4:16 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Rayaan - September 23, 2010 at 11:10 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by LastPoet - September 23, 2010 at 12:28 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by theVOID - September 23, 2010 at 5:43 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Rayaan - September 24, 2010 at 12:39 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by theVOID - September 24, 2010 at 12:53 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 23, 2010 at 9:40 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by TheDarkestOfAngels - September 23, 2010 at 11:36 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Skipper - September 24, 2010 at 5:37 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Rayaan - September 24, 2010 at 5:06 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by TheDarkestOfAngels - September 24, 2010 at 5:54 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by theVOID - September 27, 2010 at 11:17 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Welsh cake - September 25, 2010 at 4:29 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by downbeatplumb - September 25, 2010 at 8:31 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 5:50 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Shinylight - September 26, 2010 at 6:21 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 6:23 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Shinylight - September 26, 2010 at 6:35 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 6:42 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 26, 2010 at 4:51 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Shinylight - September 26, 2010 at 6:47 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 6:52 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Shinylight - September 26, 2010 at 7:04 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 7:07 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Shinylight - September 26, 2010 at 7:23 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 7:28 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Minimalist - September 26, 2010 at 8:41 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 8:57 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Minimalist - September 26, 2010 at 8:59 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 9:12 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Skipper - September 26, 2010 at 9:41 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by downbeatplumb - September 26, 2010 at 3:03 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Minimalist - September 26, 2010 at 9:16 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by solja247 - September 26, 2010 at 9:53 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Skipper - September 26, 2010 at 10:28 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by The Omnissiunt One - September 26, 2010 at 10:56 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by TheDarkestOfAngels - September 27, 2010 at 2:29 pm

RE: The fine tuning argument - by Minimalist - September 26, 2010 at 10:15 am

RE: The fine tuning argument - by LastPoet - September 26, 2010 at 11:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	The Kalam Cosmological argument.	JJoseph	113	26631	January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am Last Post: Astreja
	A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work.	JJoseph	23	6771	January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism.	Nishant Xavier	97	28171	September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm Last Post: Paraselene
	Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God.	Nishant Xavier	162	38504	July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am Last Post: Deesse23
	Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning.	Nishant Xavier	54	13008	July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am Last Post: Fake Messiah
	Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics?	FlatAssembler	49	11377	June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm Last Post: Belacqua
	Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?	FlatAssembler	61	14521	June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
	A simple argument against God	Disagreeable	149	40555	December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am Last Post: Mister Agenda
	My Almighty VS your argument against it	Won2blv	43	11225	May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?	R00tKiT	225	60121	April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me