NO it is religion. If they were not religious they would not be easily lead by the nose. Now again, not saying you can end it by force. But you buy into a utopia and those in power can use it to lead you.
Religion, in human history, all of them, is what I am talking about. It isn't a matter of humans being bad, but the concept itself being bad. It is gap filling based on false perceptions.
I hate the arguments from any religion when a liberal(could be a Christian or Muslim or Jew or whatever)
I hate it when liberals say "that is not a true" pointing to the right. No, both left and right use the exact same books to come to different conclusions and BOTH believe in the same characters of those books.
Now specifically with Christians, liberals love to point out the NT Jesus as being anti greed, non violent. But no, sorry, it sounds nice and well intended. But you cannot separate the NT character from the head leader of the entire book, whom from the beginning of that book is at best, only kind to outsiders when they submit and know their place, but most of the time are murdered by god for dissent and or murdered by his fans. NT also has Jesus demanding you abandon your family and friends if they don't kiss his ass. Then at the end of the book the God goes right back to being a violent prick condemning everyone who didn't kiss his ass.
The reality of why liberal Christians pointing out the gentile Jesus motif they want to be true, isn't coming from that book, it is coming from our species evolutionary compassion. The book itself is not required to believe in to do that.
Liberals unwittingly allow the right wingers as mentioned above the cover by ignoring this reality. It is literally religion doing this. They are not different books the left and right use, different versions still can have both right and left using those different versions.
My point is that religion poisons humans perceptions of reality, that placebo kaleidoscope thinking is gap filling when humans would do better by losing their fear of accepting reality.
If a liberal believer of any religion can accept that others of other religions or no religion can be good, then they need to consider that it is not the concept of religion, or a holy book doing it, but their natural evolutionary empathy doing it.
Religion, in human history, all of them, is what I am talking about. It isn't a matter of humans being bad, but the concept itself being bad. It is gap filling based on false perceptions.
I hate the arguments from any religion when a liberal(could be a Christian or Muslim or Jew or whatever)
I hate it when liberals say "that is not a true" pointing to the right. No, both left and right use the exact same books to come to different conclusions and BOTH believe in the same characters of those books.
Now specifically with Christians, liberals love to point out the NT Jesus as being anti greed, non violent. But no, sorry, it sounds nice and well intended. But you cannot separate the NT character from the head leader of the entire book, whom from the beginning of that book is at best, only kind to outsiders when they submit and know their place, but most of the time are murdered by god for dissent and or murdered by his fans. NT also has Jesus demanding you abandon your family and friends if they don't kiss his ass. Then at the end of the book the God goes right back to being a violent prick condemning everyone who didn't kiss his ass.
The reality of why liberal Christians pointing out the gentile Jesus motif they want to be true, isn't coming from that book, it is coming from our species evolutionary compassion. The book itself is not required to believe in to do that.
Liberals unwittingly allow the right wingers as mentioned above the cover by ignoring this reality. It is literally religion doing this. They are not different books the left and right use, different versions still can have both right and left using those different versions.
My point is that religion poisons humans perceptions of reality, that placebo kaleidoscope thinking is gap filling when humans would do better by losing their fear of accepting reality.
If a liberal believer of any religion can accept that others of other religions or no religion can be good, then they need to consider that it is not the concept of religion, or a holy book doing it, but their natural evolutionary empathy doing it.
