Feeling ignored... not a worthwhile question, huh?
Maybe it's because it doesn't address catholicism in particular... Why should the questions on this thread pertain only to catholicism?
On the other hand, catholics do claim to be the true followers of christ, so this should be quite relevant, as it may undermine some... traditions. It also casts some doubt on the legitimacy of the church founders... what did they really know?
(June 1, 2015 at 10:07 am)pocaracas Wrote: My question remains the same: How do you fit in your head the information that a writing exists, predating the canonical date of the birth of Jesus, which presents a figure whose life contains details that match very closely to the life attributed, in the canon, to Jesus?
This question is about YOU. What is your personal take on this.
Had you ever come across this detail of 1970's archeology?
Maybe it's because it doesn't address catholicism in particular... Why should the questions on this thread pertain only to catholicism?
On the other hand, catholics do claim to be the true followers of christ, so this should be quite relevant, as it may undermine some... traditions. It also casts some doubt on the legitimacy of the church founders... what did they really know?
