RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
June 4, 2015 at 2:28 am
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2015 at 2:36 am by robvalue.)
OK, even with my limited knowledge I can smell a rat. Children cannot enter into legal contracts. I know this to be the case in England, and I assume since Parkers has said the same it is the case in America.
Even if you give them the "right to enter into the contract" they still cannot do so. Such a contract is invalid.
So you'd have to change the law to allow them to enter into this contract, just to allow for this "consequence". I'm a little confused, is this argument actually being put forward in the courts, or is this a hypothetical? I'm not clear what is opinion and what is a report of current events. If they are resorting to arguments in the court that even I know are bogus they must be getting pretty desperate.
Even if you give them the "right to enter into the contract" they still cannot do so. Such a contract is invalid.
So you'd have to change the law to allow them to enter into this contract, just to allow for this "consequence". I'm a little confused, is this argument actually being put forward in the courts, or is this a hypothetical? I'm not clear what is opinion and what is a report of current events. If they are resorting to arguments in the court that even I know are bogus they must be getting pretty desperate.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum