RE: Brief History of Evolutionary Theory
September 24, 2010 at 8:45 pm
(This post was last modified: September 24, 2010 at 8:46 pm by thechristophershow.)
AtheistPhil--
That also has a book counterpart (which is just everything on the website, but contained in a book). And in that book, on page 11, it says this:
"Copy whatever you want from our website, at no charge, and share it widely."
So, like they did in the book and on the website, I cited the original sources that they got the information from. No rule-breakage here, sorry.
But it's funny that you soooo disliked what I was writing, you thought, "This can't be true. The fathers of evolution couldn't possibly have gotten some of their ideas from so-called 'spirits'! I'm going to Google some of the phrases this guy is using and see what site he's getting it from so that I can confirm my suspicions that it's a relatively unknown site, and therefore bupkis, and therefore I can ignore everything he's saying. Yes!"
And Padraic--
I agree: It probably is best if you stay silent and just observe quietly from the back row.
That also has a book counterpart (which is just everything on the website, but contained in a book). And in that book, on page 11, it says this:
"Copy whatever you want from our website, at no charge, and share it widely."
So, like they did in the book and on the website, I cited the original sources that they got the information from. No rule-breakage here, sorry.
But it's funny that you soooo disliked what I was writing, you thought, "This can't be true. The fathers of evolution couldn't possibly have gotten some of their ideas from so-called 'spirits'! I'm going to Google some of the phrases this guy is using and see what site he's getting it from so that I can confirm my suspicions that it's a relatively unknown site, and therefore bupkis, and therefore I can ignore everything he's saying. Yes!"
And Padraic--
I agree: It probably is best if you stay silent and just observe quietly from the back row.
"The chief lesson of the history of science is that it is not ignorance that menaces scientific advancement, but rather the illusion of knowledge."