Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[robvalue]

Always with the references to other historical people. It's irrelevant. Just because however many historians accepted similar or worse evidence for other people, it doesn't make the evidence any stronger here.

Can we really be sure of why he was executed, if that did indeed happen? Isn't that a bit of a stretch? Sure, we can take an educated guess, but what kind of confidence level are we talking?

Can we even be fairly sure he isn't 2 or more historical figures intertwined? The seemingly dual nature he has would seriously suggest that to a bumrash like me.