(September 25, 2010 at 1:53 pm)Cerrone Wrote:(September 25, 2010 at 1:35 pm)Ashendant Wrote: I think the point is that the radio tower was taken over, and the islamic rebels wanted for it to declare the government as an apostate, they choose not to because only when journalists are impartial is when they are taken seriously, they would lose their credibility if they claimed that
Then that is a failure on the part of those reporters to have not taken the opportunity to condemn their government... and worse than that it's egotism and vanity; if they're so hung up on preserving their outward appearance by holding up the impartiality card that they don't take a stand on daring to state the truth factually against whats left of their corrupt puppet government.
Wrong is wrong, and right is right, and times like they're going through they can't afford to tip toe around impartialialty unless they're directly benefiting from the corrupt government and its allies themselves, and they probably are in some way. Either that or they just want to make hinderances to the islamic revolution in Somalia for the hell of it.
I'll do some research on this situation actually, I think it merits it
They didn't want to claim that the government was corrupt they wanted them to declare that the government was an apostate, when according to the article they reported foreign sports and places to avoid due to violence.
