Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[robvalue]

The only people to whom HJ is really important are christian biblical scholars (thanks messiah), because they must be able to make the case or else their beliefs are clearly hogwash. But therein lies the problem, they have already concluded not just HJ but magic J exists so I tend not to trust them to be objective. They literally cannot conclude anything else.

I just find it interesting to see what we can learn with any reliability, and what these myths are based on in reality. Even I was surprised at the lack of evidence, until I'd looked into it I had assumed a lot more about Jesus could be verified.

Haha, magic J! Magic Johnson. He probably did have a magic Johnson.