(June 16, 2015 at 5:39 pm)Godschild Wrote: Paul always said He was not speaking for or from himself, He said he was speaking from Christ. Besides what's this thing you're saying mean, "we're talking about Jesus and Paul, Paul's authority comes from Christ. You're not making much sense.
His authority comes from Christ and he directly contradicts what christ says. Got it.
Quote:None of the accounts give the same number of women going to the tomb, why should they and why would that be important, the writers recorded this as they saw things to be important. This is a ploy atheist use to draw attention away from what was really important, the resurrection of Christ and that was what the writers were writing about, not women. You need to pay attention to the subject at hand and in this case it was the resurrection. I'm sure many women went to the tomb, some just didn't see the necessity of mentioning them all. None of the accounts say that "only one went."
Bingo. I was looking for the problem you couldn't solve by going 'its metaphorical' or stretching the interpretation, and here it is.
So, since we finally arrived at the conclusion there are obviously human mistakes in an allegedly divinely inspired text, why do you think that is?
Why is an omnipotent god incapable of writing a perfect book?
Could it be because it was written by humans, not god?
