(June 23, 2015 at 9:28 am)Drich Wrote: That seems to be a 'learn-ed' man's silly perception. That once 'science' can explain a 'natural phemona' works it can no longer be of God. My question to you is why is that? Why can't 'science' be the how God does what He does, rather than the so called 'proof' their is no God?
If you think about it for a moment God is the creator of the NATURAL Universe. Which means He would have been the being who put all of the laws that govern how everything works into place. The same laws we are recording and giving our own names and titles to. So if this is the case why would God create a universe that He has to move or circumvent the natural laws inorder to make something happen. Not to say God can circumvent the natural world, if He wanted, but why would you create something that you have to circumvent everytime you want something done??? If it is in your power to create something that will only in the end lend itself to you and your end game wouldn't that be smarter?
...
You have just explained one of the reasons why the god described in the Bible is imperfect. A perfect being would NEVER perform a miracle, because, if he created anything (which he wouldn't, but that is a topic for another conversation) he would have set things up right in the first place.
A god that has to perform miracles to tweak things is an incompetent buffoon who failed to set things up properly in the first place. Thus, if there is a perfect being, it cannot be the god of the Bible, as it would NEVER perform miracles.
The Bible is a false, blasphemous book, that you should reject.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
