RE: Do you have the right to be an atheist?
June 29, 2015 at 7:57 am
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2015 at 7:58 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
@ Neimenovic,
I agree with the definition that a "God" is a superior being because of the fact that the main reason people even started worshiping Wind,Storm,Sun,Lightning,Thunder,or generally any strong force which is impossible to understand and which is not to be messed with, were because they thought that these forces were not to be messed with and they were probably intimidated by them and they couldn't understand it.Which implies the most basic definition of a "god" is in fact a "Superior being".
Why would humans even start worshiping them if they weren't "Superior beings",they wanted to please these forces so that it wouldn't do them no ill.
The most basic definition of "God" is "A superior being" there's nothing more to it.Religion may want us to think there is some kind of Justice or some other similar crap behind it but the
truth is that the most basic definition of a "God" is "A superior being" that shouldn't be messed with.
I didn't change the definition of a God i simplified it.
It would be not very smart to prove the existence of a god which religion depicts because the religious definition of "God" is inconsistent.
Most religion depicts "God" as some kind of unknown "being" that watches over us and with whom we shouldn't mess with. a.k.a "Superior being"
I believe there are other life on the universe.If any one of those beings is superior to humans in every aspect then they are by definition god.
My original point was that it was more logical to believe in the existence of a god rather than the non-existence of such and i believe i've provided sufficient input.
I agree with the definition that a "God" is a superior being because of the fact that the main reason people even started worshiping Wind,Storm,Sun,Lightning,Thunder,or generally any strong force which is impossible to understand and which is not to be messed with, were because they thought that these forces were not to be messed with and they were probably intimidated by them and they couldn't understand it.Which implies the most basic definition of a "god" is in fact a "Superior being".
Why would humans even start worshiping them if they weren't "Superior beings",they wanted to please these forces so that it wouldn't do them no ill.
The most basic definition of "God" is "A superior being" there's nothing more to it.Religion may want us to think there is some kind of Justice or some other similar crap behind it but the
truth is that the most basic definition of a "God" is "A superior being" that shouldn't be messed with.
I didn't change the definition of a God i simplified it.
It would be not very smart to prove the existence of a god which religion depicts because the religious definition of "God" is inconsistent.
Most religion depicts "God" as some kind of unknown "being" that watches over us and with whom we shouldn't mess with. a.k.a "Superior being"
I believe there are other life on the universe.If any one of those beings is superior to humans in every aspect then they are by definition god.
My original point was that it was more logical to believe in the existence of a god rather than the non-existence of such and i believe i've provided sufficient input.