(June 29, 2015 at 2:34 am)pool Wrote: *Y is saying to X that god doesn't exi[s]t.
Except that that doesn't represent many, if not most, atheists, rendering it a strawman.
(June 29, 2015 at 2:34 am)pool Wrote: *X supply logical arguments to support X's theory.
Except you haven't really done that. If you want to support the "theory" -- and you haven't even shopped a theory, but we can get to that discussion another time -- if you wish to support the claim that a god of any sort exists, you'll need evidence that cannot be explained by other means.
Quote:*Y should believe X if Y cannot disapprove X's argument
No. In the absence of evidence, Y should be perfectly comfortable saying "I don't know, and neither do you."
(June 29, 2015 at 2:34 am)pool Wrote: See,i'm not shifting the burden of proof.
Well, that's not really accurate.
Also, you'll need to demonstrate the existence of extremely powerful and intelligent aliens before you can conclude "god exists".
