RE: My supporting POV on selfishness motivating human moral values
July 1, 2015 at 2:54 pm
(This post was last modified: July 1, 2015 at 2:55 pm by CapnAwesome.)
(July 1, 2015 at 2:36 pm)smax Wrote:(July 1, 2015 at 2:22 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: This is a very good example of my point. You've just made the definition of self-interest include everything. If the definition of self interest is so broad as to cover the entire motivation of curing boredom much less anything that provides mental stimulation, then it's a useless phrase that just means 'everything you do' rather than anything useful at all.
The whole point of the theory and this discussion is to examine the root of moral values. And, it sounds like, as you examine the root of your own actions, you are coming to realize that selfishness (self-interest) is at the root.
People also associate the word "selfish" as socially negative and as something commonly accepted as an unappealing characteristic. Therefore, in the pursuit of self interest, the word "selfish" is naturally rejected by the self serving individual.
I definitely do not find selfishness at the root of my own actions. Even though I'm a selfish person, most of my actions are done out of boredom, or an effort to combat boredom and my moral values come from a wide myriad of places. It's not a 'selfish' thing to deal with one's own boredom because there is no selfless alternative. It's not more selfish or selfless to remain bored. Selfishness has nothing to do with it and I think you and the other people who make this argument are just inserting selfish motivations everywhere where there are none. What I am finding more and more is that you've expanded the definition of selfishness to the point of ridiculousness. If Squashing a spider, not squashing a spider, eating a dog and not eating a dog are all selfish actions than it's a pointless definition that can be used on anything. NOT that everything is selfish.