(July 5, 2015 at 2:09 pm)pool Wrote: Yes.
But what you're missing is the part where i explicitly states that the burden of proof is on the atheists in the event of considering theism as bullshit and choosing not to dissolve atheism.
If you're confused as to why atheism have to be dissolved in the event theism is declared bullshit - read the quote again and more carefully you will eventually understand it.
@downbeatplumb, My first language is Malayalam,my second language is Hindi,English is my third language.
"Well, to paraphrase Mozart, all the subatomic particles are there, I just have to put them in the right order." - Sheldon Cooper
Atheist is a lack of belief in gods, there is no circumstance in which it would adopt the burden of proof. I have read your quote 50 times it doesn't make any sense, because I don't think you understand the terms your using or how the burden of proof works.
