(July 5, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Alex K Wrote:(July 4, 2015 at 9:13 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I have no -clue- what that question is supposed to mean. The right to a thought? Is that remotely enforcable one way or another, do rights protect thoughts or prohibit them? Who would say that we don't, and who would know, and what could or would be done about it?
I think OP kinda meant "having the right to be atheist" in the sense of "can atheism ever be a rationally justified position to take". at least that's how I read it...
But doesn't he mean just strong atheism, the belief that gods do not exist?
[Pretty pathetic when others have to debate what it is you mean. Then again I am multi-linguistically challenged, so what do I know?]
