Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[snowtracks]

Your 'chip-on-the-shoulder' atheistic style has been completely kicked-to-the-curb. I previously commented that Dawkins' attitude, articles, books were looking 'clownish' which this article points out, So much for the militant atheist movement.  http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/8885...w-atheism/

---

The only clown in this thread is you, Krusty. Telling me i've got a chip on my solider might be true, but it doesn't detract from the fact you are still and continually talking 'shit'.

---

Atheism has precisely fuck all to do with science, so again, stop talking shit about things you haven't got the foggiest clue about. Dawkins was/is a brilliant evolutionary biologist above and beyond an atheist talking head.

---

What the spectator (as if you've ever heard of the Spectator. Google search for cherry picking much?) thinks about his articles/attitudes means fuck all to me. Maybe you should actually engage in learning about science instead of simply trashing it? After all, you reap the benefits of scientific discovery and inquiry every day of your life. You're no better than a parasite if all you do is leach off it's discoveries and give nothing but contempt and ignorance back.

Until you can demonstrate that you know what the fuck you're talking about, and about what the above article has to do with science and this 'subliminal belief in god' you can jog right the fuck on.

---

A ‘brilliant evolutionist biologist”, well not exactly. When asked what was the Origin of Life his answer is ‘was the first replicating molecule’,* then the question: how did that happen? Answer he doesn’t know. (could have originated from another civilization somewhere in the universe). --- it’s those stupid aliens again. To have replication capabilities, complex systems need to be operational with DNA coding completely functional. *time 2:55