It's simple, Chad. Either show us in PP's mission statement where they express support for racist eugenics, or retract this petulant line of argumentation. Or are you actually unable to distinguish between what an organization does and what it stands for, on the one hand, and the views (unexceptional in their day, as Steel has pointed out) of the organization's founder decades ago? Of course, there is always another possibility: that you are a dishonest tool, a conclusion I'm trying to avoid drawing.
What's it going to be?
What's it going to be?
