Actual proof of the resurrection - and not Randy's horseshit gibberish - would have to have an impact. As Mencken said:
"Empty-tomb" garbage aside, you can't ask for evidence and then when given it pretend that it does not change the equation. If the evidence survives peer review ( doubtful but possible) it certainly changes the debate.
Quote:There is no possibility whatsoever of reconciling science and theology, at least in Christendom. Either Jesus rose from the dead or he didn’t. If he did, then Christianity becomes plausible; if he did not, then it is sheer nonsense.
"Empty-tomb" garbage aside, you can't ask for evidence and then when given it pretend that it does not change the equation. If the evidence survives peer review ( doubtful but possible) it certainly changes the debate.