(July 18, 2015 at 9:07 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:Indeed, and I find that unjustifiable - The problem with religious morality is precisely that it refuses to adapt to what's new - My point was just that the "Mohammed was a paedophile" is a ridiculous argument because many people back them were paedophiles.(July 18, 2015 at 8:59 am)Dystopia Wrote: I personally think it's ridiculous to label Mohammed as paedophile and use it as an excuse to criticize Islam - Everyone back them married pre-pubescent girls, Europeans did it too for some time and Queens could procreate since the first time they had period. I'm not saying that it's right by today's standards, but it isn't a valid criticism of Mohammed.
Oh, please. Firstly - 9 year olds DON'T HAVE PERIODS.
Secondly - no one is advocating sex with children because of what some queen might or might not have done 500 years ago. However great many Muslims DO justify child marriages by pointing to Mohammad's sex-life.
Including the dumbass that started this thread.
Are you sure about that? My girlfriend had her period a few days before hitting 10. Is she physically deficient?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
