Let's just throw this out there and have fun with it.
would this person be okay with me running test in the medical laboratory for his diagnosis based on the way that evidence in given to prove god,hell,afterlilfe?
I'll bet not.
say he has a high sodium level. I might repeat it to make sure before i give it to the doctor however by this post's standards of science i would instead find out that he's a black male which is known for high blood pressure and so conclude that the no retest is neccessary since other evidence shows that it should be true. No retest needed.
this is the evidence that this poster's standards are falling on and i dare say even more shaky than the example I gave.
would this person be okay with me running test in the medical laboratory for his diagnosis based on the way that evidence in given to prove god,hell,afterlilfe?
I'll bet not.
say he has a high sodium level. I might repeat it to make sure before i give it to the doctor however by this post's standards of science i would instead find out that he's a black male which is known for high blood pressure and so conclude that the no retest is neccessary since other evidence shows that it should be true. No retest needed.
this is the evidence that this poster's standards are falling on and i dare say even more shaky than the example I gave.
