(August 15, 2012 at 4:57 pm)jonb Wrote: It is clear in those reports the contacts covered both events, therefore your assertion they are unrelated seems hard to justify. If you have evidence that the contracts did not cover both events put up or shut up.Did you even read my post? I never denied that the contracts covered both events. I pointed out that just because the coercion happened at the Jubilee does not mean it happened at the Olympics. Also, the fact that it was covered so widely by the media in the Jubilee makes is all the more likely that it would likewise be covered again if it happened at the Olympics. However, as I also pointed out, the coverage also makes it more likely that the company involved made sure the same thing didn't happen at the Olympics.
You have failed to provide evidence that the same thing happened at the Olympics. Just because the same company were used does not mean the same thing happened. There is no evidence that the same thing happened at the Olympics; now you put up or shut up, and don't make a strawman of my argument again.
