Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 13, 2024, 8:58 pm

Poll: Does Prospect have a point?
This poll is closed.
No, they completely misunderstand Dawkins, they should know better.
80.00%
4 80.00%
They're right about Dawkins being inconsistent and contradictary, he's also too mean too religion!
20.00%
1 20.00%
Prospect are totally right! I never thought of the book that way!/I've always thought the same thing myself.
0%
0 0%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dawkins>Prospect(?)
#27
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?)
(October 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm)ManofGOD Wrote:
(October 23, 2008 at 1:59 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:
(October 23, 2008 at 1:54 pm)ManofGOD Wrote:
(October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm)chatpilot Wrote: ManofGOD let me ask you a question.So, since we don't know the origins of life through scientific discovery you think we are to just give up and accept the version written down by some leader of a nomadic tribe that claims to have had a revelation from God about 6 to 10,000 years ago?That makes as much sense as jumping off a plane without a parachute.Also,remember that a revelation is only a revelation to the one who claims to have received it and hearsay to all the rest.

I have had a revelation from GOD and more. It takes very little to go from atheist to believer. I do not believe that science should be neglected, because of a belief in GOD. The GOD of creation is a GOD of order and he loves logic, reason and truth.

I'd almost go as far as saying that this seems like you're pretending to believe this, - for a joke. It somewhat seems like it IMO.
Oh and btw, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is just as plausible as any other 'supernatural' God.
Ramen.
Oh, and one more thing, whether you're really serious or not: If the soul=conscious mind and the heart=unconscious mind...then whats supernatural about that? What's supernatural about the soul and the spirit if they're merely material parts of the mind that can be explained neurologically etc.
P.S: You're surprisingly fun to debate with, it seems as though something funny's going on.
Ramen.

Remember, the neurological perspective, while valid, is only an aspect of the truth. The spirit is a part of GOD. Only GODs word can nourish the spirit. The spirit/soul lives on after death. I dis-regarded the bible, until earlier this year when I had a spiritual birth.
I said:
Quote:If the soul=conscious mind and the heart=unconscious mind...then whats supernatural about that? What's supernatural about the soul and the spirit if they're merely material parts of the mind that can be explained neurologically etc.
Where is the spiritual explanation? Other than just a mere claim that spirit exists? I said that you said that the conscious mind is soul and the unconcsious mind is spirit...if they are just parts of the mind....how's that spiritual? How's that supernatural?
Its like Steven Weinberg said, and I paraphrase here: 'If you say God is the universe or God is energy. Then you can find God in a lump of coal.'
How is that in any way spritual or supernatural? How is that anything other than material? What's spiritual about that?
Ok I gotta go, just for the now, - I'll be back later.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Tiberius - October 21, 2008 at 9:33 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 21, 2008 at 9:43 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 22, 2008 at 7:13 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 22, 2008 at 7:28 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Kyuuketsuki - October 23, 2008 at 5:10 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:09 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:17 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:24 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Bungy - October 23, 2008 at 10:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 8:47 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:01 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 12:49 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:37 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:31 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:54 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 1:59 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:15 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:22 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:48 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 3:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:35 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 1:44 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:38 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 23, 2008 at 1:46 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:01 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 2:14 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by ManofGOD - October 23, 2008 at 2:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by bozo - October 23, 2008 at 2:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 24, 2008 at 12:50 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 24, 2008 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 29, 2008 at 12:30 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 29, 2008 at 12:36 pm
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by chatpilot - October 31, 2008 at 10:39 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by Edwardo Piet - October 31, 2008 at 11:05 am
RE: Dawkins>Prospect(?) - by leo-rcc - October 31, 2008 at 11:30 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Richard Dawkins + Nightwish = Epic Mechaghostman2 2 844 January 27, 2016 at 4:16 pm
Last Post: Videodrome
  Does the prospect of nuclear disaster still frighten anyone these days? Mudhammam 68 8061 March 23, 2015 at 2:12 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Richard Dawkins being his usual prissy self CleanShavenJesus 27 8569 November 7, 2013 at 6:47 am
Last Post: Napoléon
  Richard Dawkins does a Strange Esquilax 10 2507 June 26, 2013 at 11:41 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Dawkins defeated in debate? Brian37 7 2391 March 21, 2013 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: Baalzebutt
  Dawkins blasts segregation on twitter. Brian37 23 5988 March 17, 2013 at 5:13 pm
Last Post: Dawud
  Dawkins to appear on Simpsons cartoon. Brian37 0 789 March 6, 2013 at 11:42 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Where do you rate on Dawkins scale? GodlessGirl 88 29744 July 27, 2012 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Reforged
  Script for the south park episode featuring dawkins Edwardo Piet 2 3584 October 6, 2008 at 9:56 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)