Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Ace]

Oohh, so being off-topic is bad. Got it.

Okay, so someone refresh me, then.. WTF does any of this have to do with a Same-Sex Marriage ruling from SCotUS that found sexual orientation does not meet the strict scrutiny test, under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment, for a compelling government interest in prohibiting their access to the civil institution of marriage under state law?

Bad no. When you start arguing to different things and lose the original meaning of original argument then yea it can be.

Hahah the crazy thing is that my comment was based on someone else's comment about biology ( I think, I have to go back and read). But it is just a damn side comment.

You asking why the court ruled that way or what this little bitching of arm chopping has to do with same marrage? I think it was changed, the topic of the thread, to what is the social wrong doe same sex marrage to biological wrong to same sex marrage. And I think that is were it is now. Hell I usllly just go with the flow of what is being written or talked about at the time.

But like I say if you want to discuss how (hahah) arm amputation relates to the courts aruent for same sex marrag. I think I can take on that challenge. Mmmmm maybe.