(March 12, 2016 at 6:26 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote:(March 12, 2016 at 5:34 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: This sort of reasoning has been addressed. Read the paper. It's by an atheist philosopher.Why does this have any relevance?
Do you think that because the word atheist is there to describe someone we will all suddenly just go with it?
Do you agree with everyone who is a Muslim because the word muslimis used to describe them?
What I mean is that it's not arguing for a soul. And it's not written with a motive to defend faith. So it might be worth looking at from an Atheistic viewpoint in that they won't be saying, it's another one of those Theistic apologetic. It seems he use to rely a lot on these arguments himself, till he realized they were problematic. He is still a materialist, but he doesn't believe there is any arguments to prove materialism.