There are some actions that are almost universally regarded as moral or immoral. For instance, giving to charity is generally regarded as moral, while stealing is generally regarded as immoral. Two examples:
1. John has donated $1000 to Oxfam. He simply donated the money, and didn't talk about it. James, through whatever means, found out and donated $2000 to Oxfam, and immediately went round crowing about how he donated twice as much as John, that cheap fuck. Further, James' motivation for his giving was solely to get one up on John, who he never liked. Does John's motivation (helping hungry people) make his action more moral than James' motivation (making himself look better than John)? Remember that in both cases, the end result is the same - people are helped.
2. Susan sees a money clip lying on the floor of a restaurant. No one is about, so she scoops it up and uses the money to buy the shoes she's had her eye on but just couldn't afford. Brenda finds a wallet on a park bench and takes $50 from it to buy the medicine her 6 years old son needs, but which she can't afford. Does Brenda's motivation (helping her sick child) make her action more moral than Susan's motivation (really cute shoes)? Remember, in both cases theft has occurred and innocent parties are out money due to the actions of both women.
Boru
1. John has donated $1000 to Oxfam. He simply donated the money, and didn't talk about it. James, through whatever means, found out and donated $2000 to Oxfam, and immediately went round crowing about how he donated twice as much as John, that cheap fuck. Further, James' motivation for his giving was solely to get one up on John, who he never liked. Does John's motivation (helping hungry people) make his action more moral than James' motivation (making himself look better than John)? Remember that in both cases, the end result is the same - people are helped.
2. Susan sees a money clip lying on the floor of a restaurant. No one is about, so she scoops it up and uses the money to buy the shoes she's had her eye on but just couldn't afford. Brenda finds a wallet on a park bench and takes $50 from it to buy the medicine her 6 years old son needs, but which she can't afford. Does Brenda's motivation (helping her sick child) make her action more moral than Susan's motivation (really cute shoes)? Remember, in both cases theft has occurred and innocent parties are out money due to the actions of both women.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
