RE: A.S.K. your way to proof.
March 16, 2020 at 11:38 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2020 at 11:46 am by Simon Moon.)
(March 16, 2020 at 10:06 am)Drich Wrote: I get it though.. so long as I leave room for speculation and doubt to my abilities or story you all feel comfortable enough to keep me around. However when I show enough proof or take away your doubt cushion, and I am panning out to be exactly who I said I was all along.. Time to rework the rules to keep the mob's pride intact. People can not stand someone living a life that makes their out to be a lie. And the deeper one is invested in this lie the more the urgence there is to get rid of me, even the site of my posts which were all self contasined IE I never posted on anyone else's stuff unless asked to do so. That was too much even is that level of censorship is usually reserved for fascists.
After all can't have one christian shut down and run off a whole website of people. People who can't seem to break or refute one of his biblical arguments.
What is ironic, is that what most of you were trying to do "Ignore me and I will go away/don't answer my questions, fill my threads with non related commentary" was exactly what i forced you to do by putting the OP in video form. IT forced people into silence, people who would otherwise disrupt my efforts by using strawman and red herrings, were forced to remain topically silent, which allowed me to pick and choose. So rather than spend 4 hours a day there.. I was down to about 15 mins. which frees me up to make more videos and answer more serious questions.
I think it's kind of cute that that's the way you see it.
Dritch, your arguments are about as effective as rubber knife at a gun fight.
They are all loaded with: flawed epistemology, fallacies, appeals to ancient texts, and your personal feelings. I can guarantee that your arguments have not affected anyone that understands: good standards of evidence, the correct application of skepticism, critical thinking, and logic.
If you want to brag about the possibility that you convinced someone who's just as gullible as you are, then have at it.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.