(February 24, 2009 at 6:13 am)Tiberius Wrote:I'd say he is sticking with it because he *believes* it to be the case.(February 24, 2009 at 1:55 am)Ephrium Wrote: Deeper blue won Kasparov in Chess didn't it?Deeper blue beat Kasparov at Chess, but what does that prove? Only that a computer can beat humans at certain tasks (well we knew that already). It only beat Kasparov because it can think of moves in advance to a very deep level, whereas Kasparov cannot go as deep.
And I still stand with the possible scenario that the creator CAN be less complex.
You still haven't given a scenario where a creator is less complex, so I don't see why you are standing by it.
In the same way a theist believes in creationism.