Dinosaurs and Man

[ScienceLovesGod]

[quote='ScienceLovesGod' pid='294307' dateline='1338776644']

Where did all that water go? If what you say were true, all that water would have to go somewhere, or else the continents would be under water. Also, there is no geological evidence to support these claims. None whatsoever, in fact.

The water is still here. The land was raised and the valleys of the deep formed, thus creating a barrier to keep the water out. The scientific support is out there, just look with a non-biased observation, like I did with evolution.

The titanic was bigger.

I didn't say bigger, I said greater.

You don't have any clue how many species you're talking about do you? That's clear, so you really don't have to answer that.

About 10,000 species of bird, 4,600 mammals, 9,000 reptiles, and 6,000 amphibians. Add 2,000 for extinct species. Add 10,000 for the future species we might find. This gives a total of 41,600 species. Times two equals 83,200 animals. At 21" per cubit, gives an ark of over 2 million cubic feet. More than enough room.

Very few can. What about the marine life that depends on osmotic pressure? Why are they still here? They couldn't have survived it. Do you know anything about marine biology? If you did, then you'd know that salt water species excrete salt, and if there isn't enough salt in the water, their CNS will shut down, resulting in death.

Kidneys and gills are used to balance salt-intake and osmotic pressure. The salinity of the ocean is increasing. Therefore, the salinity of the water 4,000 years ago was a lot less. Underwater lava creates hot water, which dissolves minerals, adding salt to the water. They could have easily survived. Using today's marine wildlife as an example to disprove the Flood is irrelevant.

Really? How? Explain, and please do provide peer reviewed evidence to support this, and all of your claims.

I simply do not know the answer yet.

Climates were fine??????????? What about penguins? Did he have a cold climate for them, while simultaneously creating a hot climate for snakes, lizards, etc? That's crazy fucking bullshit!!!!!!! Listen to yourself!!!! It never fucking happened. I am so sure the lions, tigers, panthers, wolves, eagles and polar bears just LOVED that dried goods diet. Hypercarnivores are all about the dried goods.

Antarctica used to be sub-tropical. Reptiles could survive warm weather; it does not need to be "hot". Carnivores will scavenge if necessary; dried meats are perfectly suitable.

And you still haven't answered this question: Humans were inhabiting North America 50,000 years ago. Are you willing to accept that as a fact? If so, are you under the misconception that dinosaurs also inhabited America 50,000 years ago?

50,000 years is almost the maximum amount of years allowed for the conclusions drawn from radiocarbon dating. Why? Because after that, it isn't clear. Lots of factors. Lots of estimates. It's only accurate for a few thousand years, after that it's simply not clear. But what happens when you use carbon14 dating to determine dinosaur fossils? Just ask Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which concluded a dinosaur bone to be a few thousand years old.

Any more questions? This was supposed to be about the Paluxy River tracks.

---

I've asked theist morons this before...


Day one - the gazelles, wildebeest, gnus, zebras, and lions leave "Ararat" for Africa.

Day two - the lions get hungry. Then what?

Since you've already based your question on the assumption that God did in fact lead the animals to the Ark without fighting with each other, then they did the same when they left. Every animal that was aboard the Ark has it in them to be tame and obedient, put there by God. Even fierce, wild lions can be tamed, and behave in a non-violent manner towards species they might have been violent towards before. And that's a fact.