Rules
Wiki
Search
Member List
Help
Hello There, Guest!
Login
(
Lost Password?
)
Register
Login
Username:
Password:
Lost Password?
Remember me
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider
donating
or
becoming a Patron
to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on
Twitter
and liking our page on
Facebook
!
Current time:
May 12, 2024, 5:27 am
Atheist Forums
›
Community
›
Religion
›
Christianity
« Previous
1
...
118
119
120
121
122
...
223
Next »
The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
Thread Rating:
0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5
Thread Modes
The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
Optimistic Mysanthrope
Member
Religious Views: pantheist loneshark
Posts: 579
Threads: 3
Joined: October 18, 2013
Reputation:
14
#227
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 4, 2013 at 7:28 pm
Ah, apologies
Find
Reply
«
Next Oldest
|
Next Newest
»
Atheist Forums
›
Community
›
Religion
›
Christianity
« Previous
1
...
118
119
120
121
122
...
223
Next »
The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
Messages In This Thread
The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Justtristo
- June 27, 2012 at 4:43 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Darwinian
- June 27, 2012 at 6:10 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Justtristo
- June 27, 2012 at 7:13 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
NoMoreFaith
- June 27, 2012 at 7:24 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 21, 2013 at 6:01 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- October 21, 2013 at 6:08 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 21, 2013 at 6:19 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- October 21, 2013 at 7:58 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 21, 2013 at 7:00 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 21, 2013 at 7:24 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 21, 2013 at 7:39 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 21, 2013 at 7:56 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 21, 2013 at 8:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Gambit
- June 27, 2012 at 7:48 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Cato
- June 27, 2012 at 7:51 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- June 27, 2012 at 10:43 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
popeyespappy
- June 27, 2012 at 2:03 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Jackalope
- June 27, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zaphod Beeblebrox
- June 27, 2012 at 8:41 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Justtristo
- June 27, 2012 at 9:18 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zaphod Beeblebrox
- June 27, 2012 at 11:02 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Thor
- June 27, 2012 at 10:27 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- October 25, 2013 at 3:43 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- October 25, 2013 at 4:04 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 25, 2013 at 4:38 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- October 25, 2013 at 5:07 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 25, 2013 at 6:04 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 25, 2013 at 6:39 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- October 25, 2013 at 8:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 25, 2013 at 10:54 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- June 27, 2012 at 11:47 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- June 27, 2012 at 1:08 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- June 27, 2012 at 1:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Gambit
- June 27, 2012 at 1:46 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- June 28, 2012 at 1:16 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- June 27, 2012 at 2:31 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
libalchris
- June 28, 2012 at 1:07 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Welsh cake
- June 28, 2012 at 1:59 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- June 29, 2012 at 5:57 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
KichigaiNeko
- June 29, 2012 at 8:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Norfolk And Chance
- June 29, 2012 at 10:17 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Dolphins are the best
- October 19, 2013 at 9:11 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Kayenneh
- October 19, 2013 at 10:10 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- October 21, 2013 at 3:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
TheBeardedDude
- October 21, 2013 at 3:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tonus
- October 21, 2013 at 4:10 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
TheBeardedDude
- October 21, 2013 at 4:18 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
ThomM
- October 21, 2013 at 6:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- October 21, 2013 at 3:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Bob Kelso
- October 21, 2013 at 3:46 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 21, 2013 at 5:42 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
LastPoet
- October 21, 2013 at 5:55 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tonus
- October 21, 2013 at 6:52 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
ThomM
- October 21, 2013 at 7:27 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 21, 2013 at 10:48 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 22, 2013 at 5:13 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 22, 2013 at 5:41 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 22, 2013 at 7:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 22, 2013 at 9:56 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- October 23, 2013 at 11:33 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 22, 2013 at 10:13 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- October 22, 2013 at 11:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Owlix
- October 24, 2013 at 1:40 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- October 24, 2013 at 2:20 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Fidel_Castronaut
- October 24, 2013 at 8:33 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Cato
- October 24, 2013 at 1:47 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- October 24, 2013 at 1:50 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Cato
- October 24, 2013 at 2:24 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- October 24, 2013 at 3:54 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 24, 2013 at 6:26 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
TheBeardedDude
- October 24, 2013 at 8:09 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- October 24, 2013 at 12:42 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
TheBeardedDude
- October 24, 2013 at 1:48 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 24, 2013 at 1:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 24, 2013 at 1:40 pm
Re: RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
TheBeardedDude
- October 25, 2013 at 4:00 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Owlix
- October 25, 2013 at 5:34 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 25, 2013 at 5:46 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Foxaèr
- October 25, 2013 at 6:48 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Thor
- October 26, 2013 at 12:57 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- October 26, 2013 at 7:50 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- October 27, 2013 at 2:06 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Owlix
- October 25, 2013 at 6:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 25, 2013 at 7:02 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- October 25, 2013 at 6:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 25, 2013 at 9:18 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Owlix
- October 25, 2013 at 9:32 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
KichigaiNeko
- October 25, 2013 at 9:34 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Owlix
- October 25, 2013 at 9:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
freedomfromforum
- October 27, 2013 at 2:31 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 28, 2013 at 8:10 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- October 29, 2013 at 6:13 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 28, 2013 at 8:48 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- October 28, 2013 at 9:26 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 29, 2013 at 8:04 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- October 29, 2013 at 7:14 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 29, 2013 at 8:30 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 29, 2013 at 10:30 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 29, 2013 at 10:06 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 29, 2013 at 11:05 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 30, 2013 at 8:28 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 30, 2013 at 9:41 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- October 30, 2013 at 11:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 30, 2013 at 12:17 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 30, 2013 at 12:55 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 30, 2013 at 1:09 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- October 31, 2013 at 12:13 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 31, 2013 at 7:19 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 1, 2013 at 5:03 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 1, 2013 at 9:32 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- November 1, 2013 at 10:40 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 4, 2013 at 2:41 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- November 4, 2013 at 4:25 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tonus
- November 4, 2013 at 5:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 4, 2013 at 5:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- November 4, 2013 at 3:05 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 7, 2013 at 6:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- November 1, 2013 at 4:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- October 30, 2013 at 9:55 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- October 29, 2013 at 11:17 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- October 30, 2013 at 10:06 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 1, 2013 at 9:41 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 1, 2013 at 9:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 1, 2013 at 9:59 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 2, 2013 at 12:50 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Foxaèr
- November 1, 2013 at 10:01 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 1, 2013 at 11:38 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 2, 2013 at 12:22 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Thor
- November 2, 2013 at 9:22 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 2, 2013 at 10:18 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Thor
- November 3, 2013 at 12:12 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 2, 2013 at 11:16 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- November 2, 2013 at 11:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Doubting Thomas
- November 3, 2013 at 12:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 4, 2013 at 2:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 4, 2013 at 4:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 6, 2013 at 10:54 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 7, 2013 at 3:21 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 7, 2013 at 9:19 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 7, 2013 at 11:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 7, 2013 at 11:54 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 7, 2013 at 3:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 7, 2013 at 3:58 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 18, 2013 at 6:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- November 19, 2013 at 6:01 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- November 19, 2013 at 4:01 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 20, 2013 at 8:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- November 20, 2013 at 10:39 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 21, 2013 at 6:14 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 19, 2013 at 5:51 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
The Valkyrie
- November 19, 2013 at 6:25 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 19, 2013 at 12:57 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 21, 2013 at 7:58 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 22, 2013 at 8:05 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 22, 2013 at 6:31 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- November 23, 2013 at 1:07 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Brian37
- November 22, 2013 at 6:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 22, 2013 at 7:10 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Brian37
- November 23, 2013 at 2:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 22, 2013 at 7:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 22, 2013 at 7:34 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 23, 2013 at 10:30 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- November 22, 2013 at 7:39 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 22, 2013 at 7:54 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Foxaèr
- November 22, 2013 at 7:57 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- November 22, 2013 at 8:09 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- November 22, 2013 at 8:14 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 24, 2013 at 8:40 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 24, 2013 at 10:19 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- November 24, 2013 at 1:29 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 26, 2013 at 2:34 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zazzy
- November 25, 2013 at 11:57 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 26, 2013 at 6:50 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 26, 2013 at 6:58 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 26, 2013 at 9:56 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 26, 2013 at 9:19 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 26, 2013 at 10:54 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 26, 2013 at 2:44 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 26, 2013 at 6:46 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 26, 2013 at 7:54 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 26, 2013 at 8:16 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 27, 2013 at 12:53 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 27, 2013 at 8:56 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 27, 2013 at 11:06 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 27, 2013 at 11:26 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 27, 2013 at 11:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 27, 2013 at 12:06 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 27, 2013 at 12:32 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 27, 2013 at 8:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 28, 2013 at 2:59 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 28, 2013 at 5:18 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 28, 2013 at 5:50 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 28, 2013 at 7:37 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 28, 2013 at 7:45 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 28, 2013 at 8:17 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- November 28, 2013 at 8:45 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 28, 2013 at 11:20 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- November 28, 2013 at 1:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- November 29, 2013 at 9:23 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- November 28, 2013 at 2:33 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- November 28, 2013 at 2:38 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Godlesspanther
- November 28, 2013 at 2:43 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- November 28, 2013 at 3:09 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- November 28, 2013 at 6:43 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 1, 2013 at 5:02 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 1, 2013 at 7:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 2, 2013 at 6:09 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 2, 2013 at 6:37 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 2, 2013 at 7:07 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- December 2, 2013 at 7:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 2, 2013 at 8:17 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- December 2, 2013 at 11:56 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 3, 2013 at 4:48 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- December 5, 2013 at 5:26 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 5, 2013 at 6:03 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tonus
- December 4, 2013 at 11:54 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Lion IRC
- December 2, 2013 at 10:02 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
ablenova
- December 2, 2013 at 7:18 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- December 2, 2013 at 10:34 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Lion IRC
- December 3, 2013 at 5:12 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 2, 2013 at 11:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 3, 2013 at 5:12 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 3, 2013 at 5:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 4, 2013 at 7:32 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 4, 2013 at 5:31 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 4, 2013 at 5:48 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 4, 2013 at 7:24 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 4, 2013 at 7:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Ryantology
- December 4, 2013 at 7:44 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 4, 2013 at 7:46 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 5, 2013 at 11:22 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 12:13 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 5, 2013 at 12:40 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 4:06 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 5, 2013 at 4:21 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 5, 2013 at 12:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 5, 2013 at 4:44 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 6:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 5, 2013 at 7:22 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 5, 2013 at 6:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 7:10 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 9:02 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 5, 2013 at 9:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 9:57 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 5, 2013 at 10:09 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 5, 2013 at 10:30 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 6, 2013 at 12:03 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 6, 2013 at 1:59 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 6, 2013 at 10:19 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Michael Schubert
- December 5, 2013 at 11:00 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Ryantology
- December 7, 2013 at 12:28 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 7, 2013 at 1:18 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
ThomM
- December 7, 2013 at 10:27 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 7, 2013 at 5:01 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 7, 2013 at 10:09 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 9, 2013 at 6:40 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 9, 2013 at 10:03 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 12, 2013 at 7:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 12, 2013 at 10:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 13, 2013 at 2:06 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 13, 2013 at 7:01 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 14, 2013 at 5:12 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Optimistic Mysanthrope
- December 15, 2013 at 4:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 17, 2013 at 8:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 18, 2013 at 1:06 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 18, 2013 at 7:40 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- December 18, 2013 at 8:33 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 19, 2013 at 4:44 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 20, 2013 at 8:25 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
theyear12013
- December 21, 2013 at 12:49 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tonus
- December 21, 2013 at 3:42 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- December 21, 2013 at 9:27 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 21, 2013 at 10:56 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 24, 2013 at 4:16 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Godlesspanther
- December 24, 2013 at 6:55 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 25, 2013 at 11:46 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- December 26, 2013 at 12:07 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 26, 2013 at 12:09 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- December 26, 2013 at 12:30 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 27, 2013 at 12:53 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- December 27, 2013 at 12:58 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- December 26, 2013 at 12:58 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 26, 2013 at 1:06 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 26, 2013 at 9:15 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- December 26, 2013 at 9:23 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 26, 2013 at 4:04 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 26, 2013 at 4:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- December 26, 2013 at 10:55 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 27, 2013 at 2:55 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
KichigaiNeko
- December 27, 2013 at 8:12 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 27, 2013 at 8:19 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
KichigaiNeko
- December 27, 2013 at 8:21 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 27, 2013 at 8:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 28, 2013 at 12:23 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 30, 2013 at 8:35 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- December 30, 2013 at 10:44 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tea Earl Grey Hot
- December 27, 2013 at 8:38 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- December 27, 2013 at 9:16 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- December 27, 2013 at 9:51 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- January 3, 2014 at 8:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- January 6, 2014 at 12:25 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- January 6, 2014 at 9:14 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- January 6, 2014 at 1:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- January 6, 2014 at 2:37 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- January 7, 2014 at 1:31 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- January 6, 2014 at 3:17 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- January 8, 2014 at 9:26 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Mudhammam
- January 8, 2014 at 10:17 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- January 15, 2014 at 7:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- January 16, 2014 at 12:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- January 16, 2014 at 1:49 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- January 21, 2014 at 2:55 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Cyberman
- January 21, 2014 at 7:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
WesOlsen
- January 21, 2014 at 2:16 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- January 24, 2014 at 10:40 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 6, 2014 at 8:57 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- February 7, 2014 at 11:48 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Whateverist
- February 6, 2014 at 9:02 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 6, 2014 at 9:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Esquilax
- February 7, 2014 at 1:52 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Whateverist
- February 7, 2014 at 11:44 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Chas
- February 8, 2014 at 5:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Anomalocaris
- February 6, 2014 at 11:53 pm
Re: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
StuW
- February 7, 2014 at 12:11 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- February 7, 2014 at 2:10 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Mudhammam
- February 7, 2014 at 3:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
WesOlsen
- February 7, 2014 at 4:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- February 8, 2014 at 5:51 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- February 11, 2014 at 9:20 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 14, 2014 at 10:18 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
JuliaL
- February 15, 2014 at 12:19 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Tonus
- February 14, 2014 at 10:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Ryantology
- February 14, 2014 at 10:33 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- February 15, 2014 at 11:23 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- February 15, 2014 at 11:32 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 15, 2014 at 6:36 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
orogenicman
- February 15, 2014 at 11:31 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 16, 2014 at 3:35 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 16, 2014 at 5:32 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 16, 2014 at 5:46 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 16, 2014 at 6:18 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 16, 2014 at 10:57 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 18, 2014 at 6:04 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
StuW
- February 18, 2014 at 8:24 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 18, 2014 at 9:54 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 19, 2014 at 6:20 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 19, 2014 at 7:36 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 19, 2014 at 7:45 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 19, 2014 at 8:02 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 19, 2014 at 8:18 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 19, 2014 at 8:30 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 19, 2014 at 8:39 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 19, 2014 at 8:40 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 19, 2014 at 8:54 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 19, 2014 at 9:07 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 19, 2014 at 9:13 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 19, 2014 at 9:17 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 19, 2014 at 8:38 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 20, 2014 at 5:47 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
JuliaL
- February 25, 2014 at 11:54 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 26, 2014 at 3:27 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
JuliaL
- February 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 20, 2014 at 5:26 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 20, 2014 at 7:20 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 20, 2014 at 7:33 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 20, 2014 at 7:44 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Crossless1
- February 19, 2014 at 8:53 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 19, 2014 at 11:50 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 20, 2014 at 4:49 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- February 20, 2014 at 1:04 am
The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Rampant.A.I.
- February 20, 2014 at 1:13 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Zen Badger
- February 20, 2014 at 8:14 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 20, 2014 at 8:34 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 21, 2014 at 6:18 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 21, 2014 at 6:47 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 21, 2014 at 9:23 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 22, 2014 at 3:19 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 24, 2014 at 5:15 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- February 22, 2014 at 6:17 am
The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Rampant.A.I.
- February 22, 2014 at 4:51 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Statler Waldorf
- February 25, 2014 at 7:22 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Wyrd of Gawd
- February 25, 2014 at 7:28 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 25, 2014 at 9:51 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
downbeatplumb
- February 24, 2014 at 3:44 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Alex K
- February 24, 2014 at 5:27 pm
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- March 3, 2014 at 12:30 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Wyrd of Gawd
- March 3, 2014 at 2:03 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- March 3, 2014 at 3:47 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Wyrd of Gawd
- March 3, 2014 at 4:37 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
LostLocke
- March 3, 2014 at 9:52 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
popeyespappy
- March 3, 2014 at 10:34 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Wyrd of Gawd
- March 4, 2014 at 4:23 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Bad Writer
- March 3, 2014 at 12:40 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
snowtracks
- March 3, 2014 at 1:35 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
JuliaL
- March 3, 2014 at 3:42 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Cyberman
- March 3, 2014 at 12:56 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Bad Writer
- March 3, 2014 at 1:03 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Cyberman
- March 3, 2014 at 1:06 am
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
- by
Minimalist
- March 3, 2014 at 3:25 pm
Possibly Related Threads...
Thread
Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Still Angry about Abraham and Isaac
zwanzig
29
2068
October 1, 2023 at 7:58 pm
Last Post
:
LinuxGal
Why are you (still) a Christian?
FrustratedFool
304
19596
September 29, 2023 at 5:16 pm
Last Post
:
Bucky Ball
GOD's Mercy While It Is Still Today - Believe!
Mercyvessel
102
8583
January 9, 2022 at 1:31 am
Last Post
:
Fake Messiah
[Not] Breaking news; Catholic church still hateful
Nay_Sayer
18
1603
March 17, 2021 at 11:43 am
Last Post
:
The Grand Nudger
How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian?
KUSA
371
89841
May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post
:
Paleophyte
Age of the Universe/Earth
Ferrocyanide
31
4089
January 8, 2020 at 10:06 pm
Last Post
:
Gawdzilla Sama
No-one under 25 in iceland believes god created the universe
downbeatplumb
8
1783
August 19, 2018 at 7:55 pm
Last Post
:
Succubus
Attended church for the first time in years
Aegon
23
1827
August 8, 2018 at 3:01 pm
Last Post
:
Crossless2.0
So, are the Boils of Egypt still a 'thing' ??
vorlon13
26
5708
May 8, 2018 at 1:29 am
Last Post
:
Minimalist
Jesus : The Early years
chimp3
139
22698
April 1, 2018 at 1:40 am
Last Post
:
Minimalist
View a Printable Version
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode