(July 16, 2012 at 4:40 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Evidence of the past: We have memory of the past that is reliable.
So the fact that you believe that the past is reliable...is evidence that the past is reliable?
How do you know that your memory that the past is reliable...is reliable? You're just assuming that it is. Which is circular, and thus disqualifies your argument.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”