An empirical observation of the metaphysical - so hard evidence of something abstract.
I must admit I have no clue what you're saying. Even this concise summary. Saying that though I haven't bothered to look up the words you're using either. ..Strike that - I just did and it didn't help.
Could you point us/ me in the direction of a simplistic, ie layman's guide to philosophical literature, and especially the Thomistic tradition please?
What concerns me is this is a type of presentation that propagates the very fault with Catholicism at the reformation. (ie Catholicism sought to hide the meaning of what was in fact very simple in the interest of amassing power at all levels, exactly what Jesus himself demonstrated the greatest anger towards in the temple. The holy of holies which Jesus smashed.)
I must admit I have no clue what you're saying. Even this concise summary. Saying that though I haven't bothered to look up the words you're using either. ..Strike that - I just did and it didn't help.
Could you point us/ me in the direction of a simplistic, ie layman's guide to philosophical literature, and especially the Thomistic tradition please?
What concerns me is this is a type of presentation that propagates the very fault with Catholicism at the reformation. (ie Catholicism sought to hide the meaning of what was in fact very simple in the interest of amassing power at all levels, exactly what Jesus himself demonstrated the greatest anger towards in the temple. The holy of holies which Jesus smashed.)
