(October 28, 2012 at 12:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(October 28, 2012 at 12:45 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I think again you aren't understanding the paradox from my perspective.
This is a strawman.
.......
"There needs to direction of non-conscious towards consciousness by process of survival of fittest."
Did I misunderstand this statement?
Again, it's just part of the paradox. One step is needed between consciousness and unconsciousness. It seems people agree with this. For example, we are formed by dna, and at one point, we aren't conscious, then we become conscious, no matter how weak that level of conscious is.
But such a step is complex, and needed direction (from DNA). The complexity doesn't allow it to be simply by one step of mutations.