(February 7, 2013 at 2:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm not much of a fan of the fucking cops, either. Here's another example of a "trained and experienced" gun owner going off the deep end.
http://apnews.excite.com/article/2013020...V2V82.html
Quote: LOS ANGELES (AP) - Los Angeles police Chief Charlie Beck says the fugitive ex-police officer wanted in three murders has multiple weapons including an assault rifle.
Beck also says more than 40 protection details have been assigned to possible targets of fired officer Christopher Dorner.
Beck says the massive manhunt for Dorner may be the largest in the department's history.
Out here (Phoenix) late last year two of these heroes shot and killed a wheel chair bound man because he had a gun. I think we had a "suicide by cop" situation and they are all too willing to oblige....especially if it is a minority.
Then why aren't you and other gun control supporters advocating for comprehensive gun control (at the point of manufacture and wholesale, restricting purchase by both civilians and state organs), rather than just selective gun control (at point of retail sale to civilians)? I have yet to hear one good argument from a selective gun control advocate to explain why not-- so go ahead and surprise me.
I own firearms, and have never shot anyone with them, nor do I anticipate doing so at any point in the future, yet people like you want to restrict my access to them while doing nothing to restrict access by the police forces and the military who are using them to kill and oppress a whole lot more people in a year than all the nutjob spree killers in American history combined. Nah, I'm all set with that bullshit. Come back to me with a comprehensive proposal and we'll talk. Hell if there were legislation that promised universal small arms reduction, I'd back it 100%, until then it's just saying the slave masters get certain weapons that the slaves don't.
Quote:I've got plenty of examples of republicunt politicians trying to put fucking guns everywhere. I'll stick with the Dems. They're safer.
Not by much, if at all. There's plenty of evidence that Obama has had a worse civil liberty violation record than Bush. They're both imperialist parties run by the capitalists, thus dangerous to anyone who isn't in the ruling class. The Dems are just saner and less bigoted against minorities in American society.
"A dolla makes me holla, Honey Boo-Boo" -- Honey Boo-Boo