(May 6, 2014 at 12:55 pm)KUSA Wrote: Your president obviously agrees with this statement. Look at all the guns protecting him.
Are you a moron? When you're the most powerful individual in the world with a massive list of enemies and their cohorts who would kill you without hesitation given the chance, then you can get back to me with NEEDING advanced killing machines to protect you at all times.
(May 6, 2014 at 7:40 pm)KUSA Wrote: What strawman? It seems like every liberal celebrity that hates guns is surrounded by them by choice. You say the president has no choice in this well what if he did? Do you think he would say no to having guns protecting him? Fuck no he wouldn't. He would be a fool not to want them.
The 1st strawman was the claim that I want to take your guns from you, which I never said. I said we need sensible gun regulation laws.
Second straw man was that their is an obvious categorical difference between the most powerful man on earth needing an extensive security detail and a regular Joe just picking up an AR-15 because he thinks he needs to not just protect himself, but have overwhelming force to eviscerate the body of any person he thinks might pose a threat to him. And all this, without it being federally required (some local laws do) that you have a background check and periodic psych-evaluations so we know you're not a criminal and so we know if you're mentally stable enough to reasonably be in possession of something that is designed to kill other living things. Federally, we require much more just to legally own and drive a car than we do for owning guns, which is just insane.
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
-George Carlin