RE: Atheism, Theism, Science & Philosophy
May 2, 2013 at 10:33 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2013 at 11:06 am by The Reality Salesman01.)
(May 2, 2013 at 9:50 am)Love Wrote: I am attempting to use reasoned argument to explain something that I believe is beyond the scope of reasonYES! It is unreasonalbe and therefore irrational, and so....
(May 2, 2013 at 9:50 am)Love Wrote: which obviously comes across to you as unreasonable.You have a firm grasp of our disagreement. You are making unreasonable and therein irrational inferences and even after clearly describing why such a thing fails you say...
(May 2, 2013 at 9:50 am)Love Wrote: I also depart from you with the term "rational intuition" (which is the only form of intuition in which analytic philosophers are interested).But, why? You've already explained to yourself that this is unreasonable...
(May 2, 2013 at 9:50 am)Love Wrote: I think empiricism and intuition can work well togetherYou and I agree on this as I've specified in the earlier post. It is a very useful tool if applied rationally, but then you said...
(May 2, 2013 at 9:50 am)Love Wrote: I am attempting to use reasoned argument to explain something that I believe is beyond the scope of reasonand so our disagreement begins at the starting point. The thing that is begging the question is...
(May 2, 2013 at 9:50 am)Love Wrote: I believe knowledge can be attained beyond the sensory experience.Why? Any attempt to justify this claim will stem from an irrational argument which will be inherently illogical. So, attempting to justify it with rational intuition will be a failed effort, and I will be perfectly justified to circurlarly reject your claims.
