RE: If you believe in the God of the Bible, why try to prove it logically?
June 18, 2013 at 2:16 am
(June 18, 2013 at 1:24 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(June 17, 2013 at 4:06 pm)orogenicman Wrote: The evidence is in the words Moses allegedly (according to your bible) himself spoke to his men. Oh, and you didn't answer my question. Why am I not surprised?
The evidence says the opposite of what you're claiming. You keep repeating it like you have word blindness. This is hilarious.
(June 17, 2013 at 4:37 pm)Zarith Wrote: They believe it is just because God supposedly willed it. If God willed for a woman to be raped, beheaded, and then set on fire; it would be just, by definition. There is no reasoning with anybody like this; it is morality by fiat.
You too lol. If no one was raped according to the evidence you are presenting how am I supposed to be defending rape?
Are you seriously reading words that aren't there? Is that the extent of your delusion?
I'm finding this unbelievable. How many times can you guys argue that black is white.
And you keep denying it as if it isn't written in your Bible. And that is just sad.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
